Traditional Logic
GHOLAMALI MOGHADDAM; alireza andarzgo
Abstract
AbstractWith regard to the division of carrying, into the primary essential predication and common technical predication , there have been differences of opinion in determining examples and matching with types, among others, there are opinions about the quality of predication the essentials together ...
Read More
AbstractWith regard to the division of carrying, into the primary essential predication and common technical predication , there have been differences of opinion in determining examples and matching with types, among others, there are opinions about the quality of predication the essentials together and on the essence. It is well-known that carrying genus and differentia on species of each other is a common technical predication. Allameh Tabatabai considers the predication of genus and differentia to each other common technical predication and the predication of genus and differentia to species as the primary essential predication, as some like Allameh Javadi Amoli have introduced the predication of genus and differentia to each other and the predication of genus and differentia to type as the primary essential predication. It is possible that Allameh Tabatabai's point of view may be criticized and challenged, but it seems that according to the basis of Allameh's point of view, the criticisms raised can be answered. In this article, while analyzing the basis of Allameh in predication the essentials on the essence, some problems raised at the level of the theory have been investigated.Key words: Allameh Tabatabaei, primary essential predication common technical
GHOLAMALI MOGHADDAM
Abstract
Logic is considered a Criterion of thought correction, and in order to be a criterion, it must have sufficient clarity to correct thought. Naming and defining are imaginary principles of science and need this clarity more than other topics. The naming of modal proposition in traditional logic is less ...
Read More
Logic is considered a Criterion of thought correction, and in order to be a criterion, it must have sufficient clarity to correct thought. Naming and defining are imaginary principles of science and need this clarity more than other topics. The naming of modal proposition in traditional logic is less committed to this principle and has been exaggerated and ambiguous. Naturally, modal proposition in traditional logic is met with reluctance by logic students. The use of strange words and vague naming methods in the position of education, leads to more reluctance in this area. This method will reduce the logic learner's desire to continue the discussion in traditional modal and will lead to its seclusion in traditional logic. So, the research question is: what is the critique of the traditional modal Logic method in naming modal proposition? And how can we change this method to make it easier to teach logic? In this article - analytically - we have criticized the naming method of modal proposition in traditional modal Logic. And we have shown how we can use proper names in naming modal propositions. This way, reduced the difficulty of naming modal propositions in traditional modal Logic.
GHOLAMALI MOGHADDAM
Abstract
Easiness in teaching is one of the educational principles in science. Observance of this principle in discovering, defining, explaining, reasoning, and explaining the results, helps us to accelerate learning. Logic, which claims to measure and correct thought, Must be more observant of this principle ...
Read More
Easiness in teaching is one of the educational principles in science. Observance of this principle in discovering, defining, explaining, reasoning, and explaining the results, helps us to accelerate learning. Logic, which claims to measure and correct thought, Must be more observant of this principle than other sciences. But it seems that, the naming of modal proposition in traditional logic is less committed to this principle. This method of naming in the early stages of education, reduces the desire of the logic student to continue the discussion in modal Logic, and will lead to the isolation of modal Logic in traditional logic schools. So, the research question is: what is the critique of the traditional modal Logic method in naming modal proposition? And how can we change this method to make it easier to teach logic? In this article - analytically - we have criticized the naming method of modal proposition in traditional modal Logic. And we have shown that how can we use proper names in naming modal proposition. This way, reduced the difficulty of naming modal proposition in traditional modal Logic.
GHOLAMALI MOGHADDAM
Abstract
The separation of ontological issues from ontology is one of the most important issues in epistemology. The rules of logic are responsible for analyzing and explaining the laws of detection Unknown conception and Unknown ratification. In traditional logic, the proposition, as the subject of the logic ...
Read More
The separation of ontological issues from ontology is one of the most important issues in epistemology. The rules of logic are responsible for analyzing and explaining the laws of detection Unknown conception and Unknown ratification. In traditional logic, the proposition, as the subject of the logic of assertion, is Logical Secondary intelligible and has a formal and anecdotal truth. Formal logic is responsible for providing the instruments of composition between the theorems. The theorem content, the type of its connection with outside world and its Semantic issues are outside from this domain. It seems that the modal discussions in traditional logic, in some cases, have provided the interference of matter and form and entry of some objective rules into the subjective proposition. Actuality, permanence and faculty are Different from the formal. These are related to the process of objective objects in the external world. Adding these modals to the theorem structure has caused confusion, complexity, discrepancy, and ambiguity in traditional modal logic. In this article, we have demonstrated by analytical way that traditional logic can be criticized for adding modals to the proposition structure and, and for limiting the modal logic in certain modals.
